Here's a really good editorial on the analysis of the possibility of war in the near future.
Slight easing of tensions with Merkel drawing back from the brink and continuing support for Russia's Nord Stream 2 Natural Gas Pipeline. We could say that the lack of further bad news has reduced out estimate of nuclear war, but best not to be optimistic until we hear Putin's National Address tomorrow.
Reactions:
The reactions we've received to our "war" coverage have been mixed. We've had some positive and even heart warming reactions (along the lines of "thank god, I thought no one else had noticed") and some sharp reactions (been called morons, trolls -- all the usual). So lets just calmly look at the facts.
First thing to note is some automatically think we are predicting, with unwarranted certainty, that the world is about to blow up. We have never predicted that the outcome would be even more than 50% likely to be war, nor more than 2% likely to involve civilians.
The first "scary" message we are trying to impart is that in no way should we even accept a tiny percentage chance of a global nuclear war. This should concern you as Tucker Carlson would say. Ie: If we love our life and our children, we should never allow any kind of mortal danger that exceeds 0.1%. We would not accept such a risk when flying, driving or crossing a road, so why should we accept that Biden has pushed us into a near 2% risk of war involving civilian casualties?
The second "scary" message we are trying to impart is that there is a madman in the Whitehouse who is highly motivated to start a war that would bury his election fraud skeletons forever. A little history -- When Margaret Thatcher sent a flotilla to take back the Falklands, she was doing badly in the polls. Afterwards, she had a political revival. Putin AND Biden are both looking for that.
The third "scary" message is ominous... The Woke Generals and the madmen Cabal at the helm seem oblivious to the real risks. They seem to not understand that they cannot win against the combined forces of Russia, China, North Korea (with a huge army and navy) and Iran. Indeed, the US Navy recently angered India, and we know Syria isn't their friends. True, America has NATO, but they are soft and flabby, like Lloyd Austin's "Tranny Army", by comparison to Asian armies. As if to confirm, note the latest bulletin showing us China's nuclear involvement here.
But remember, we are simply attacking the small but unacceptable chance of war. We are trying to make you aware. Not trying to scare you without reason (certainly not for financial gain as we rely solely on donations which dry up when we deal with bitter truths). The only thing we hope you do is protest and be vocal - spread the word.
Important Announcement
An official tweet(HERE) has been put out by US Strategic Command. As copied above, it reads "#USSTRATCOM Posture Statement Preview: The spectrum of conflict today is neither linear nor predictable. We must account for the possibility of conflict leading to conditions which could very rapidly drive an adversary to consider nuclear use as their least bad option."
The media has LIED to us by playing down the risk to the point of misleading us, and so global Nuclear War is now imminent and comes as a surprise. The US Military was and is not thinking. They have cornered Putin and created too many enemies. Putin isn't going to move pawns, he will call checkmate. The US cannot win against Russia, China, Iran and North Korea(good ref here) who will, if they have decided to, simultaneously strike when least expected (eg: nighttime). They will either target amassed US troops near the Ukraine, plus the US/NATO navy and hardware(tanks etc) OR they will go for US Silos as well with heavy global radioactive fallout.
The US has nowhere to retaliate without it involving aiming back at civilians in Russia and China - they will retaliate in kind on cities across the globe. Or the US will have to accept defeat and it will be invaded.
Updated Estimates: Our estimate of chances of conventional or nuclear war = 50% (up from 25% yesterday), chance of nuclear strikes involving silos on US soil = 10%, and escalating to involve civilian targets = 2% (up from 1% yesterday). Don't forget that is 50% unlikely to happen, and 98% unlikely to involve civilian targets.
And still we see people mocking the message on Twitter, blinded by the media. This would be an exceedingly good time for the Military to stop playing games and take the election fraud seriously. When you look at the fighting talk and sanctions, one could be forgiven there is a madman in the Whitehouse.
--//--
Earlier..
Putin addresses nation tomorrow (21st).
Quiet in Ukraine.
Lindell's Free Speech site not as expected.
UK Update -- Boris needs a rocket up his arse --
link
